Connect with us

News

Stun Gun Used To Murder Sushant Singh Rajput? Subramanian Swamy Requests NIA To Know The Truth

Ramnika Chadha

Published

on

Almost 2 months have passed since we heard the news of the sudden demise of Sushant Singh Rajput. Few of us are still not able to believe that he is gone. We are still mourning about his death and praying for justice. On top of this, daily we get to know a new shocking story emerging in this case. The most shocking revelation till now says that maybe Sushant was killed using a Stun Gun. One of the true fans and followers of Sushant has claimed that Sushant was killed with the help of a stun gun (this gun is used to paralyze a person). Sushant’s body had red marks on the left side of his neck, they are quite similar to the marks that are caused using a stun gun.

The fan blamed Rhea Chakraborty and Aditya Thackeray for the same. He tagged Rajya Sabha MP Shri Subramanian Swamy and wrote:

“Today I have read a lot about stun guns and how they r used ! also what mark do they leave ! the exact mark❗❗ guyzz they really used stun guns to paralyse him !#ArrestRhea. #adityathackeray”. 

Sushant Singh Singh Rajput Murdered Using Stun Gun? Subramanian Swamy Demands NIA Probe

When the tweet went viral, Subramanian Swamy demanded the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to join the CBI in investigating Sushant Singh Rajput’s case and know the truth.

Swamy wrote in reply to that fan:

“Were this gun smuggled from which the Arabian Sea bordering country? NIA must now join the probe.”

The stun gun theory has surprised us with a lot of facts. This was originally posted by Dr. Raju Wadhwa, a practicing doctor in Internal Medicine in the US. He believes that stun guns were used to kill Sushant. He supported his claim by pointing out the burn marks on the left side of Rajput’s neck.

After his sudden demise, we paid a heartfelt tribute to Sushant Singh Rajput through a video. Subscribe to the channel for more videos!

Tech sanitize | tribute to sushant singh rajput

As a true fan of Sushant, I wish that he gets justice soon. Let’s keep praying. He needs our support!

A post-graduate in HR from the renowned Institute of Management Technology, she holds a 4 year experience in the same field. Being a passionate blogger/content writer too, she holds an expertise in writing on various subject matters.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Groping without skin contact, not sexual assault, rules Bombay High Court

Say India

Published

on

The Nagpur bench of the Bombay high court has set aside the conviction of a man who was found guilty under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act for groping a 12-year-old girl four years ago, committing his punishment.

“In view of the above discussion, this court holds that the appellant is acquitted under Section 8 of the Pocso Act and convicted under minor offence u/s 354 of IPC {Indian Penal Code} and sentenced him to undergo RI (rigorous imprisonment). for one year and to pay fine of ₹500/-, in default of fine to suffer RI for one month. The sentence for the offence punishable under Section 342 of the IPC i.e. six months and fine of ₹500/-, in default to suffer RI for one month, is maintained,” noted the bench.

The POCSO Act defines sexual assault as when someone “with sexual intent touches the vagina, penis, anus or breast of the child or makes the child touch the vagina, penis, anus or breast of such person or any other person, or does any other act with sexual intent which involves physical contact without penetration is said to commit sexual assault”.

The court, in its verdict, held that this “physical contact” mentioned in the definition of sexual assault must be “skin to skin” or direct physical contact.

Continue Reading

News

Assam BJP Leader Protests, Says No Beef For Tigers At Guwahati Zoo

Say India

Published

on

Hardline Assam BJP leader Satya Ranjan Borah has a problem with serving beef – not just to people, but also to carnivorous animals in zoos, specifically tigers.

On Monday a small group of protesters led by Mr Borah – claiming to be anti-beef activists – attempted to block the main gate at Guwahati Zoo as vehicles carrying beef for tigers were trying to pass. Zoo authorities managed to disperse them with help from the police, official sources said.

The protesters shouted slogans demanding a carpet ban on cow slaughter.

“In Hindu society we give importance to protection of cow, but it is the staple food for carnivores in the zoo and part of government supply. Our objection is – why serve beef? Why not other meat?” Mr Borah asked reporters.

Read full news at NDTV

Continue Reading

News

Parle & Bajaj Refuse to Advertise on News Channels Carrying ‘Toxic Content’, Social Media Likes That

Avatar

Published

on

By

After fake TRP manipulation racket by several news broadcasters, Parle Products and Bajaj have decided not to advertise on news channels that are broadcasting ‘toxic and aggressive content’

“We are exploring possibilities wherein other advertisers can come together and sort of put a restraint on their advertising spends on news channels, so that there is some sort of a clear signal to all the news channels, that they better change their content,” Krishnarao Buddha was quoted as saying.

Industrialist Rajiv Bajaj, who is managing director of Bajaj Auto, also declared that his company has blacklisted 3 news channels for endorsing toxic content.

Last week, the Mumbai Police claimed to have busted a major TRP manipulation scheme by at least three TV channels, including Republic TV. Mumbai Police alleged that households were paid to keep channels switched on the entire day and boost the TRPs for certain channels.

Continue Reading

Trending